Sunday, 6 April 1884

The Canroberts come to see me and propose going to the horse show on Monday. I refuse, naturally. And being as intimate as we are, I have often let slip words of discontent and allusions against my family — and against my aunt, whom people in Paris believe to be under the shadow of some infamous lawsuit, cited as a witness because her brothers thrashed a government official...
Left alone with that little fool Claire I begin to say that... We first note that people believe me ill and reproach me for not being good to my family, who adores me, adores me! Whereupon I say — after much: “it is stupid to say, it is no one’s business, and if I don’t tell it people will think I am truly mad to rage for nothing” — well, here it is: twenty years ago one of my uncles thrashed a man; you know how things drag on in Russia, and this matter is sent to the embassy, and people believe God knows what...
And with that, great tears; illegible
“But is it possible that for so little your aunt — and why does she not wish to?”
“Ah! that is exactly it — out of selfishness, out of nonchalance; she tells herself it is a trifle, that it does not matter; she does not want to make this journey and endure a small inconvenience, and I, I...”
It was needless to tell it — and yet it is better to tell the truth... But no one will believe it.
Who will believe it — that a beloved being like me should be tortured over such a trifle? People will think my aunt is about to face a penal colony.
I can no longer think about this subject without tears pouring from every corner of my eyes like a torrent.
in the marginécriture de Mme Bashkirtseff mère
in the margin my dear adored child, all this because you are ill and your nerves are at the end of their strength. (Mme Bashkirtseff’s handwriting) [Two pages torn out]
My aunt’s departure, and I tell the whole story... She agrees that I am right but cannot understand how it could happen when I am so loved. Well...
Rodolphe Julian dines with us — only three of us, Maman keeping to her bed. I retell the story recounted to Villevieille, then we return to Bastien; I want things to be more cheerful.
This Julian takes extreme pleasure in saying dreadful things to me about myself.
Well, there is in me only one interesting aspect — the work. As for the rest!
I am wicked, I am heartless. Nothing of the woman, nothing tender, nothing loving. Perfidies, perversities, a fantastic brain — but nothing but brain, no heart, only the head. A demoniac’s head — and that is why the man of my dreams, the one I should want entirely, will not love me. He will be attracted but never completely.
Yes — he will give his deepest self to his cook.
“It is possible — but in short, you lack that feminine side, simple, appealing, calm — and you will always be alone on your height; for I do not contest the height...”
“Thank you — but that speech was already given by Claude Vignon to Mlle des Touches, and there is nothing in it that humiliates me.”
“Agreed — only the great man, the one you will notice, for that one will be great...”
“Do you know any? I am speaking of a young Gambetta...”
“He is dead.”
“Or a Bismarck.”
“He is seventy.”
“That is precisely what I think — for apart from that, who? To seize you entirely? I see very few.”
“That is true.”
“In... Claude and Mlle des Touches — but Mlle des Touches resembled a man; whereas you do not even resemble a man. You are a woman — and yet there is nothing.”
“So He will not love me?”
“No. For a man of that kind one would need either a beauty... one of those beauties that make the stars pale, whose taking a man’s arm would make a million jealous of him. Or millions like Mme Mackay — sixty million in income, a fortune that nothing resists... Or else a talent — but a talent so incontestably great, at such a height, that it is truly difficult to attain...”
“But that last point is not hopeless... Besides, you are giving me three infallible means of winning this man — why leave nothing to the chance of the heart?”
“The heart? Yours?”
“His.”
“But I do not see the man.”
“That is true.”
“Bastien is only a limited admiration — have you ever thought of him as a man?”
“Upon my word, no — never.”
“And the lady — have you ever imagined Bastien at her feet?”
“Oh! as to that, I assure you it is all the same to me.”
That is true.
I no longer remember all the flattering horrors he poured out — he gives himself over to it with abandon, laying out all manner of observations on my nature with delight, with relish.
“Well, M. Julian — if He prefers a turkey or the woman who roasts it, I shall console myself by inspiring feelings in lesser men.”
“You will not want them!”
“That is another question — but well, I shall marry a dummy and...”
“No — you will be virtuous.”
“Not even that?”
“Nothing — the head alone, and work.”
And then we speak of Bastien; he says one cannot even in thought surpass him — cannot see beyond what he does. That is very true. Before everything one sees, one can think: I should like to go further, to glimpse the possibility of going further — but before a Bastien, no. One can compose differently, can see other subjects, each according to one’s nature — but to surpass his execution even in dream, no; one cannot dream further. It is nature. And he is a God.

Notes

L’Hippique: the Concours hippique, the Paris horse show held each spring in the Palais de l’Industrie, a fashionable event. ↩
In Balzac’s novel Béatrix (1839), the critic Claude Vignon analyses the writer Camille Maupin (Mlle des Touches). ↩