Sunday, 24 June 1883

We go to the École to see the works sent from Rome, but since the halls were open I begin by wandering through them and revisiting the copies of masterpieces glimpsed in Italy. The splendid naturalism of Michelangelo the sculptor enchants me, and we have only a moment to see the paintings — in short I see only two: Schommer’s canvas and Doucet’s.
And both dazzle me. Schommer’s is Edith discovering the body in a field strewn with corpses — three figures standing out boldly against an evening sky: Edith and the two monks. I noticed only the effect, which is marvellous.
Similar light, the sun which is no longer visible but which reddens the sky — it is gripping.
Doucet’s Ave Maria is a thing of exquisite beauty. A town with white walls on which the sun plays. And the Virgin, dressed in white upon that other white — so adorably luminous. An angel in a yellow flowered robe kneels before her. The whites are ravishing, ideal, celestial in colour. It is full of air, full of sunlight — it radiates!
crossed outNever have I seen works sent from Rome of such beautiful feeling, of such value.
Doucet redeems himself — his technique becomes simple, broad; I am mad about it. And then? If only, like the writers one reads, I were in communication with the world! What is the use of opinions, impressions, sensations? They die here in this notebook. And all these furious forces which come to dash themselves against this rampart imprinting such a shock on my whole being that I remain suffocated and bruised.
I must uncork myself.
I need air. I am stifling.
Dante, Shakespeare, Michelangelo, Chopin, Beethoven, Balzac...
Ah — how small we are... What wretchedness, what emptiness!
And to remain here on a Sunday, doing nothing... If at least someone would come — someone interesting, with whom one could talk — but let us not count on it.
Old Mme Engelhardt and her son will be here for dinner. And here we go. Truly, it sometimes seems that the things one calls for... must happen... It is unjust. Is the will nothing, then?
Another of the things that have contributed to making me believe in my own superiority is having found in one of Balzac’s Philosophical Studies this theory of the omnipotence of Will which has preoccupied me for years, ever since I began to think.
Dreams. Show me realities that match them.
The Engelhardts and Bagnitsky the journalist to dinner, and Mme Bailleul — everything goes well. Ah!
I think of the foolishness I wrote about Antonelli. As when I said that I thought of him every evening, that I awaited him, and that had he arrived unexpectedly in Nice I should have thrown myself into his arms. And people believed I was in love with him — those who read it will believe it.
And never, never, never was it so. No, never.
But when one is bored, in the evening, in summer, one often thinks that one would be happy to have reasons to throw oneself into the arms of a man who is in love with one... I have done it a hundred times in my imagination. But then I had a name to write, a real being whom I could call Antonelli — very well, Antonelli it was...
But by that reckoning... If Ah! no, no no — never that little Italian... In love. Rather with Audiffret — oh yes. But Antonelli, never — and I am all the more vexed because people took me to be mad about him. Come now! There was the fancy of being the niece of the great cardinal who might become pope... But...
No, I have never been in love, and I shall not be now — a man would have to be so superior to please me now; I am so exacting; it would have to be... And simply to be in love with any charming young man — no, that will never be possible again.

Notes

In French in the original: envois de Rome. The works that the Prix de Rome pensioners at the Villa Medici sent to Paris each year. ↩
Count Pietro Antonelli (1853–1901), nephew of Cardinal Giacomo Antonelli, the papal Secretary of State; the young Roman about whom Marie wrote at length in 1876. ↩