Tuesday, 22 June 1880

How could I have known nothing of yesterday's tremendous session? That is a trick my painting played on me. I knew, of course, that they would be debating the amnesty, but who could have foreseen that Gambetta would speak? No newspaper gave any indication of it. I was running from shop to shop while that extraordinary man was speaking. Well! after him there is no one else. Paul de Cassagnac appears feeble, puny, a boy. If I loved Paul de Cassagnac, he would not so pitifully sink into the earth in my eyes. If I were not already a republican by conviction, that prodigious man would make me one. Do you remember, more than two years ago when I was cheering Cassagnac and said in my diary that he or another could make me a Bonapartist or anything else through sentiment, but that I was a republican in my soul? This pleases me; it proves I have some conviction, and it astonishes me. And did I not anticipate --- that is, did I not precede by two years Gambetta's speech of yesterday when I said one evening, having begun to reflect on these matters, did I not say: the Republic of today is the true one, the long-awaited one, the definitive one, a blessing from heaven, finally arrived.
What does it matter the exaggerations one employs to arrive at the just measure? [Words cancelled]. They reproach the Republic for blood, for mud, and so on. Look at the beginnings of everything, especially when half the country hinders, struggles, spoils. The nation is not a salon.
Let the partisans choose their guests, but the Republic is not a party; it is the Nation. The more who come to it, the more it will open its arms, and when everyone has come, there will be neither the proscribed, nor the abandoned, nor the chosen; there will be no more parties, there will be France.
And then the guilty will be punished but not disowned. How could it be otherwise?
They make it a crime that the Republic has wretches in its ranks --- and what nation does not?
"The Republic is neither a salon nor a coterie. If France became legitimist or imperialist, would they all therefore be pure?"