Tuesday, 1 April 1879

To begin with, I announced at the atelier that someone had fired at Gambetta. It took. And then I told them that a beam or a cornice had fallen at the Palais de l’Industrie and that three or four canvases had been torn through. That took even better; I was helped by the five or six on whom I had played the Gambetta trick (at eight in the morning); the others came after half past nine, and Zillhardt was so taken in that she was getting ready to run there — but I gave four sous to the colourman (a character attached to the place), who went off like an arrow to find out; the maid ran after him down the stairs so as not to wear the man out for nothing, while he shouted, “Let me go, let me go!” — and he came back only when he had been told twice over that it was the first of April.
But, for instance, after five o’clock — the harp lesson taken, the instalment of Duruy read, other books read as well, instruments of every kind played — there was nothing left to do; to read more would be to ruin my eyes, which I need early tomorrow. And besides, I have a cold and am tired from yesterday. In any case... it no longer matters to me; I tell you only because it seems to me a strange existence at my age, with our fortune, and in the heart of Paris.
I have resigned myself; yesterday’s weaknesses make me ashamed.
After all, one need only get it firmly into one’s head that this is how my life is made and not otherwise. I am so extinguished that I can say it is all the same thing.
Why should gaiety be more agreeable than boredom? One need only tell oneself that boredom pleases and amuses me. Reminiscences of Epictetus’s Manual — very convenient. But I could answer that impressions are involuntary, so that however strong one may be, one will always have had the first impulse, after which one may arrange things as one pleases; but it will always and nevertheless have been. And it is far more natural to continue along the path of the first impression, the natural impression, alternating or increasing the feeling experienced, than to turn it round, twist it, divert it and maim these feelings to the point of making them all alike — or, to put it better, to the point of confusing everything, effacing everything and caring for nothing any more: no longer living. Yet that is where I want to bring myself. It would be quicker to... but no, then everything would be over; I said so yesterday, whereas...
There is nothing odious in this world except not to be part of it, to live hidden away and see no one, to be unable to exchange an idea, unable to see either famous men or intelligent men, or scholars, or the men of the day. That is death, that is Hell. But let me get out of this, out of this stupefying curse which makes me unable to bear even my own family and talk only to my dogs — let me get out of it, and events will be nothing but the content of life. I shall speak only of what people have agreed to call misfortunes: well, one should not rebel and complain; misfortunes themselves are enjoyments and one must accept them as indispensable elements of life. Suppose I lose a dearly loved being — do you think it would mean nothing to me? On the contrary, I would be in despair; I would weep, moan, cry out, and then it would melt into sadness for a long time, perhaps for ever. I do not find that charming, I do not desire it, I do not prefer it, but I am obliged to say that it would be living, and consequently enjoying. One loses one’s husband or one’s child, one is betrayed by one’s friend, one cries out and reproaches Destiny; I should no doubt do as much, but these outbursts are in the order of things, and God is not offended by them, knowing, and man is not offended by them either, feeling, that they are the natural and inevitable consequences of the pain one suffers. One moans, but one does not cry out from the depths of one’s soul that it must not be. Without noticing it, one accepts it. It happens that one isolates oneself, shuts oneself up as in a cloister, afterwards. You understand: afterwards? It also happens, often, that one is happy all alone — that is to say, with a man, or with one’s father or mother, brothers, a sister, of whom one thinks and for whom one lives. But I am all alone, and I speak for people who are all alone... besides, I have taken a dislike to my family as one of the causes of my moral death. And then I am not speaking for the silent, unknown heroes described in novels by people who invent them, or copy them from life, so as not to remain like them.
I shall never repeat it to you often enough, because I believe you cannot conceive how I live. You imagine that I am complaining of a quiet life and long for noise. May be. But that is not it. I complain of living literally cut off from the living, of seeing no one but my dressmaker and my maid, and Madame Gavini from time to time. An absolutely exceptional situation in 1879, in Paris, and for no serious reason. I love solitude, and I even believe that if I were living I would withdraw from time to time to read, to meditate, to rest; then it is a charm, a sweet and exquisite happiness. In great heat you are delighted to slip down into a cellar, but let someone shut you up in it for ever and you will see! — even if the cellar is well furnished.
I hear tried souls telling me that they would a thousand times rather be dead, like me, and keep those they have lost or escape what they have suffered. Absurd! In keeping their dear ones they are no longer like me; in being spared their sorrows they would have mine, and they would not [sentence unfinished]
Now, if some clever person wished to take the trouble to confound me, he would ask me whether I would consent to buy life at the price of my mother’s death, for example. To that I would answer that I would not want it even at the price of a less dear life, since by nature one’s mother is what one loves most. I would have dreadful remorse; I would not, out of selfishness. But I have put the question badly.
I must be asked what I would rather: lose my mother while living or keep her while being dead (myself)? I cannot answer; but I will tell you that, in the state I am in, I enjoy neither my filial love nor her maternal love. Besides, it is understood that it would not depend on me; I am only asked what I would prefer.

Notes

In English in the original. ↩