Friday, 24 May 1878

There are people condemned to bad luck and there is nothing to be done. Will you say that I am not one of them?
I must tell you that having finished painting at four o’clock, I could not stop reading The Nabob, Alphonse Daudet’s novel. It is very interesting, and the Nabob type would resemble someone else if one refined and ennobled him. I know very well that the resemblance is not flattering — which is precisely why one must, as I say, refine, ennoble, spiritualise. It is not that the person is ideal, extra-refined, sublimely noble... that is to say, I am not quite sure... I do not trust my own judgement. When a person is ideal I think I mistake insipidity for distinction, and when someone seems energetic and extraordinary to me I fear it may be nothing but coarseness, vulgarity, bourgeois ordinariness. Happy, happy, happy is he who can put into words what he thinks. Read Balzac — everyone has felt as he did, but who has been able to write it?
A deep voice, soft and warm; velvet eyes, veiled and burning. A smile of marvellous kindness. And then when he is near his mother, that way of “flinging his feet and his great body down on the floor, with a coaxing tenderness of gesture and word that is truly touching.” That is what they say of the Nabob — it is what I might have said... ! No, really — if I had to stand on ceremony with my journal over all the fancies that pass through my head, that would be too ridiculous!
Now listen — on the subject of fancies: look at the good fellow Joyeuse in The Nabob — you have no doubt understood that he is entirely me, as regards imagination. I desire that the wretches who will publish this book insert here pages 87 and 88 of The Nabob.
They will see how M. Joyeuse takes the omnibus and finds himself facing a man, imagines that this man wants to kiss his daughter — whereupon he murders him and goes to declare it to the police commissioner, after which he returns to reality.
Do you want another illustration of this prodigious imagination?.. It is raining, freezing — wolf weather. M. Joyeuse has taken the omnibus to go to his office. Seated opposite an enormous fellow — brutal head, formidable biceps — M. Joyeuse, small and frail, his briefcase on his knees, tucks in his legs to make room for the enormous columns supporting his neighbour’s monumental torso. In the jostling of the vehicle, the rain on the windows, M. Joyeuse falls to musing. And suddenly the colossus opposite — who has, in sum, a decent enough face — is very surprised to see this little man change colour, stare at him with grinding teeth and ferocious eyes — murderer’s eyes. Yes, a genuine murderer’s, for at this moment M. Joyeuse is having a terrible dream... One of his daughters is sitting there, across from him, beside this giant brute, and the wretch has slipped his arm round her waist under her cloak.
“Remove your hand, sir...” M. Joyeuse has already said twice... The other has only sneered... Now he wants to kiss Elise...
“Ah! Villain!...”
Too weak to defend his daughter, M. Joyeuse, foaming with rage, reaches for his knife in his pocket, strikes the insolent man full in the chest, and goes off with his head held high — strong in his right as an outraged father — to make his declaration at the nearest police station.
“I have just killed a man in an omnibus!...”
At the sound of his own voice pronouncing these sinister words — which he has indeed pronounced, but not in the police station — the poor man wakes, guesses from the alarm of the passengers that he must have spoken aloud, and takes good advantage of the conductor’s call: “Saint-Philippe... Panthéon... Bastille...” to descend, thoroughly abashed, in the midst of general stupefaction.
On the way to his office he invented a thousand extraordinary adventures... like me — one word suffices for me to imagine a whole novel, ten novels, twenty novels — and all in a few minutes. Some, however, last for weeks. “This ever-alert imagination gave M. Joyeuse a singular physiognomy — feverish, ravaged, contrasting with his outward envelope, etc. He lived so many passionate lives in a single day... The race is more numerous than one thinks — these waking dreamers in whom a destiny too narrow compresses unemployed forces, heroic faculties — the dream is the safety-valve through which it all evaporates with terrible bubblings, a furnace-steam and floating images instantly dissipated.”
And then there is Félicia Ruÿs, who has much of me in her — the doctor’s outrage that suddenly disgusts her with everything. I have seen things of that sort.
This book, then the dreams, a host of things — so that I do not know which to mention... otherwise, look here — what I need at this moment is two men very much in love with me. Then I should allow myself to take up with a third, and it would amuse me a little. A mad idea.
I am, thank God, disgusted with those amusements, which have brought me nothing but vexation and were never worth it.
I should like to love someone — seriously, completely. But to allow myself that luxury, there would need to be at least two whom I had scorned... you understand, then the third might not love me at all.
What madness... my God, it is these long, terribly tedious evenings, this fretful household, and finally this book, the resemblances, the analogies, the fantasies — which bring moments of exhaustion during which one would like to have done with everything. And to have done with everything there are only two means: to die or to love.
Oh! If you knew how weary I am of this life of sadness, vexations, collapse!
When everything grimaces, everything flees, everything mocks...

Notes

In French in the original: la guigne. ↩
Félicia Ruys, the gifted young sculptor of Alphonse Daudet’s novel Le Nabab (1877); the «attentat du docteur» is the attempt on her by the society doctor Jenkins. ↩