Monday, 5 June 1876

Passing through the rue petite Saint-Étienne, at the corner I see Antonelli in a carriage with M. de Ballore. He did not even glance at me. Unable to contain myself, and despite my lame foot, I sprang from the landau and, as their carriage was stopped, I walked toward them calling out: Count Antonelli! He came toward us... and I woke up.
Today is the first truly hot day.
Left alone with Maman, I begged her to come to Russia; she replied that she was afraid of the verdict in the lawsuit. I told her at some length, and above all with great clarity, that this was a very small matter compared to what I suffered every day. At that she fell back on her eternal resort — first telling me she detested my father, then that I could go live wherever I wished. There are fine words from a mother, there are consolations for you. She herself is furious at my fury, and instead of trying to settle the future and speak to me gently, she says the most wounding things.
I sat in a corner and wept. It is like this every day.
— I cannot see why such despair, said my mother, over what they may have written to Antonelli! Those priests doubtless thought you were a millionaire, and they were told otherwise, and...
I replied nothing; I despised too much this manner of excusing herself in my eyes.
I was unable to paint; I read Twenty Years After aloud to Dina. For, having read it twice already, I cannot read it again alone — I want a fresh listener, so that her interest will rekindle mine.
Collignon, Dina, and I stayed until ten in the evening on my terrace, in a splendid moonlight reflected on the utterly calm sea. Last year we were whooping about with the Sapogenikoffs; this year I am discussing friendship and the relations one ought to have with one's fellow human beings with Collignon.
I made my profession of faith. This came up apropos of the Sapogenikoffs, who have still not written. One knows Collignon's admiration for them. Besides, she needs to worship someone — she, the most romantic and sentimental woman in the world.
She argued the value of friendship and the happiness of placing one's trust in others. I argued the opposite. Just think how wretched I should be had I pledged a great friendship to the Sapogenikoffs.
— One never regrets a kindness, a good deed, she said.
— A kindness, never; but a gesture, a pleasantry, an impulse from the heart — one regrets those when repaid with ingratitude. Oh! it is a very great sorrow for a person of feeling to know that the sympathy one felt, the friendship one had for someone, was wasted.
— Oh! No, Marie, I do not agree with you.
— But no, listen to me, Mademoiselle — here is an example: I exhaust myself explaining something to you, I wear myself out with arguments, and when I have talked and persuaded and asserted for a whole hour, I find that you are deaf!
— That, no doubt...
— I do not reproach you; I reproach nobody for anything, because I expect nothing from anyone, and it is the contrary of ingratitude that would have surprised me. I assure you it is better to look at life and at people as I do — to give them no place in one's heart, and to use them as rungs of a ladder on which to climb.
— Marie, Marie...
— What would you have — you are made differently from me. Look: I am certain you have spoken, or will speak, quite unfavorably of me to the Sapogenikoffs and others. I am as certain of it as if I had heard it with my own ears, and yet, you see, I am with you now as I was before and as I always shall be.
— It is your reading of the philosophers that gives you such bad ideas. You distrust everyone!
— I do not distrust; I simply trust nobody — there is a great difference.
— No, listen, Marie — you have no true friendship for anyone.
— But think what it would be if I had. Suppose that instead of having taken Marie and Olga for what they were — good girls who laughed with me, not particularly caring about me, as I did not particularly care about them — suppose I had formed a tender friendship with Olga. I write to her from Rome; she answers with three words after three weeks; I write again, and this time she does not answer at all. What do you say to that? And it is not the first example.
— But how can you ask anything of your friends if you give them nothing!
— We do not understand each other; I give them every possible courtesy, I am ready to do for them whatever is in my power — ask me anything and I shall do it gladly — but I do not give my friends my heart, for, believe me, it is very vexing to give it for nothing.
— One can never be vexed when one has done right, when one has done one's duty.
— Friendship is not a duty; you do neither good nor ill in giving your friendship. Friendship such as yours is not vulnerable to hurt, for in you it is nothing more than a perpetual need; but when it comes from the depths of the heart, it is very grievous to find oneself repaid with ingratitude.
— If someone is ungrateful, so much the worse for them!
— There — that proves exactly what I was saying: so much the worse for them!
— That is selfish.
— Before, I thought I loved everyone; but I see now that this universal love is nothing but universal indifference. And because of this indifference I feel the greatest benevolence toward my fellow human beings. I see them as wicked, which makes me indulgent to the highest degree. Have you read Epictetus? I think that in the matter of friendship one must be a Stoic. You receive a blow and you cannot prevent yourself from recoiling, from showing surprise, fear — that does not depend on you; but it does depend on you whether or not to acquiesce in that first feeling. One cannot help feeling certain sympathies, certain preferences — but one can refrain from acting on them.
— Such reading leads to atheism — you will end by believing in nothing.
— Oh! No — if you knew my thoughts you would not say that.
— All philosophers are bad for one to read.
— Not so, when one has a solid mind.
I then went on at length about Collignon's base conduct toward the Sapogenikoffs — I said base.
— But look here, I said — all things considered, there is only one thing of worth in this world (I speak of matters of feeling), and that is love...
— Yes.
— There is no greater pleasure in the world than to love and to be loved.
— That is true.
— And even so — let us not probe too deep, I beg! Let us take only the pleasure it gives us, and... the pleasure we give. Love is a divine thing in itself — not a thing, no — a feeling, I grant you that. For as long as it lasts it makes a person perfect toward the beloved — devotion, tenderness, passion, constancy, sincerity, all of it is there. So let us probe love, but never the human being — the human being may be compared to a cave: at the bottom one finds either damp and filth, or else a way out, which is to say the bottom does not exist at all. None of this prevents me from loving my fellow human beings.
— One cannot enjoy anything if one is indifferent to everything, if...
— Wait, wait — I am not indifferent; I simply grant to people only their due worth.
...And as we were about to touch on personal matters, I changed the conversation and sang the refrain of a song that has not yet been written — a refrain very much in fashion among us for the past four days.
— « Galu se multiplie
— « Que Galula !
— "But when at the exit
— "Galu multiplies himself
— "There's only, there's only, there's only
— "Galula!" to the tune of the Festin del Verno
Maman wept today; my aunt's face is all distraught. They have been speaking of me and my torments.
I am growing thin, pale, weak.
God, will they not find some way to calm me!
I walked back to my room with my arms hanging, my eyes fixed straight ahead, my brow furrowed; I was suffocating despite the blue sky, the splashing fountain, the medlar trees laden with fruit, the air so pure — I walked on without noticing. Why not simply suppose that I love him? Cowardly and unworthy as he is.
My mother does not understand this — besides, have I not accustomed all my family to regard me as a creature incapable of love?
Admire my fine theories of coquetry, my stern principles — when I tell you that if he walked in this moment I would not utter a single reproach; I would throw myself into his arms and be very happy, so happy that at this very moment I am shedding the heaviest tears because he is not here, because he will not come..
Oh! What good is love! What good is it!....
And nothing to be done! And impossible to complain! Complain of what?
He deceived me.... all along? No, never! But then, in heaven's name, explain to me what this love is, what this man is!
And I believed him, and I told him I loved him, and I threw at his feet my first modesty, and I gave him my lips!!!
I do not know whether it is illness or suffering, but I am weeping with every tear I have.
Since I love you, Duke of Hamilton, why has your shadow not the power to render me insensible and to take from me every thought but that of love for you!
But the Duke of Hamilton is only a shadow, and that is why he has no such power.
O fool, fool, fool!
I believed a man; I forgot for a moment that men must be treated like agreeable but dangerous animals! I opened my heart, I was weak — I wanted to be, out of tenderness, out of pity...
Oh! Divine mercy! Why must this affront fall upon my head! Had I not enough in my other misfortune!
Everything must be crushed in me — self-love, pride, and love itself.
What to do, what is left to me? God. Yes, God — I cannot become a nun; God in whom I believe and who refuses to look at me. God — but God must... no, I do not know how to say it.
God, God, God...
O Lord Jesus, have pity on me. For four or five days now my eyes will not dry. It is late and I cannot sleep — oh! I am wretched, oh! I suffer.
Great God, have mercy!

Notes

Vingt ans après (1845): the second volume of Alexandre Dumas's Three Musketeers series. Marie clearly loves Dumas — she has read it twice.
Epictetus (c. 50–135 CE), Stoic philosopher, born a slave, best known for his Discourses and the Enchiridion. His central teaching: we cannot control external events, only our responses to them.
Likely a reference to a scene from Mozart's Don Giovanni — "Il dissoluto punito, ossia il Don Giovanni" — whose climactic scene features a feast (il festin). The nonsense refrain plays on "Galula," a nickname.