Tuesday, 29 August 1882

Dumas is quite right: one does not hold one's subject — it is the subject that holds you. A man staking five francs may feel the same anguish as one staking a hundred thousand... I can therefore understand...
No, no! There is in me such a need to translate my impressions, such a violence of artistic emotions, so many confused things crowding in my head, that it cannot fail to find expression one day. The formula — oh, the formula.
All the fortune-hunting counts will say that the formula is marriage. I am not innocent enough to confuse the... impressions. I am no saint, and I would sometimes like to be a man — but let us not confuse, I beg you, earthly appetites that I understand by intuition or by nature... with the other... What M. Dumas fils calls love is a need like any other, and one dispenses with it easily when one is more than a young girl or an animal.
As for love — true love — well, it is an accessory, a complement, a crowning of the edifice; at least for me.
One arrives at it by other means: being known, celebrated, great — that naturally brings in its train all the successes and the passions one inspires. But here I am straying from my subject.
The point was simply to tell the false Diogenes to go hang — those who would reduce to their own level feelings they are incapable of understanding. There are filthy, ignoble, hideous creatures who reduce all feminine ambition to physical causes... [Crossed out: marry her off and she will paint] no more. Yet one might cite married women — or women who are as good as married — who have had talent and genius. There have been some too who remained Joan of Arc, but there have also been great men in the same case. You see plainly, ignoble materialists, that you are nothing but brutes. And since everything must be told you, know, you hideous beasts of St. Anthony, that if devotees of Art think about what M. Dumas fils calls love, it is as they think of their dinner, their sleep, and so forth. And [Crossed out: that if I were married it would not take from me] my love of Art — but on the contrary would allow me to devote myself to it with greater tranquillity, having no trouble to endure save that of thought. I am sorry to say this to you, but it seems to me I am arguing with real beings and answering their objections.
This book overwhelms me. Ouida is no Balzac, no Sand, no Dumas — but she has written a book which for... professional reasons gives me a fever. She has very sound ideas about art, and opinions gathered in the Italian studios where she has lived. There are passages where she says, for example, that in true artists — not artisans — the conception is immeasurably superior to their power of execution. And then the great sculptor Marix (still in the novel), looking at the tentative clay-work of the young heroine, the future woman of genius, says: let her come and work — she will do whatever she wishes.
"Yes," Tony said, looking long at my drawings in the studio — "work, mademoiselle, you will do whatever you wish."
But I have been working in the wrong direction, no doubt; Saint-Marceaux said it — my drawings are a sculptor's drawings, and I have always loved form above all else. I adore colour too — but now, after this book, and even before... painting seems wretched beside sculpture. Besides, I ought to hate it as I hate all imitations, all impostures. Nothing irritates me so much as seeing things in relief imitated in paint on a canvas that is necessarily flat and smooth. What can be more horrible than painted bas-reliefs, painted borders... From the finest works of art down to wallpaper, it enrages me as red enrages the bull. A frame imitated in paint on certain ceilings — even in the Louvre... And the borders of furnished apartments that imitate carved wood or lace flounces. It is odious.
But what is holding me back? Nothing. I am free; I am installed so that nothing is lacking for my happiness as an artist. An entire floor to myself. Anteroom, dressing room, bedroom, library communicating through a broad opening with the studio and giving a length of twelve metres; the studio with splendid light coming from all sides, as desired. A lumber room beside it and a sort of large gallery above opening directly into the studio, from which one may view one's paintings from a bird's-eye perspective, and which provides a dim, distant light from above. Then a small garden where I may go down to work.
I have had a speaking tube installed so that no one need come up to disturb me, and I need not go down often. Here is a plan — you will understand better.
[Ed. note: a floor plan of her studio drawn by Marie appeared here in the diary.]
What am I doing? A little girl who has put her old black skirt over her shoulders and is holding an open umbrella. I work outdoors and it rains almost every day. And then... what does it signify? What is it compared to a thought in marble? And what am I to do with my sketch from three years ago — for it dates from October 1879? We were given this subject at Julian's and I was seized by it as the holy women were seized at the sepulchre. Ariadne. Julian and Tony found there was fine feeling there; I am gripped by it as I am by the painting I am doing now. For three years I have been on the point of sculpting it... I feel powerless before commonplace things... And the terrible what is the point? cuts off my arms. Theseus fled in the night; Ariadne, finding herself alone at dawn, wanders across the island in every direction; then, at the first rays of the sun, having reached the edge of a promontory, she sees a speck on the horizon — the ship... That is the moment to seize, and difficult to describe: she can go no further, she cannot call out, the water is all around, the ship is a mere speck hardly visible — and so she collapses onto the rock, her head on her right arm, in a pose that must express all the horror of abandonment, of despair, of the helplessness of this woman left there so basely... I cannot say it, but there is in it a rage of impotence, a supreme dejection to express, that grips me entirely. You understand — she is there at the very edge of the promontory, exhausted with grief and, to my mind, with impotent fury; there is a complete surrender of the whole being, the end of everything... That abrupt rock, that brute force that chains the will... In short...
Yes — the preoccupation with linear perspective is a deception; the preoccupation with tone and colour is a wretched thing, a craft matter that little by little absorbs everything, leaving no room for thought. Thinkers and poets in painting are eighth-rate technicians.
How could I have been so mistaken? And to cling to this mad energy...